Why Amy Coney Barrett’s Nomination Is Bad For Muslims

Yesterday, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee began affirmation hearings in a rushed effort to nominate Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court to fill the seat left vacant by late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. 

This reckless effort is going on regardless of persevering with hypothesis about Barrett’s nomination announcement occasion being a coronavirus superspreader that led to an outbreak amongst White House workers, administration officers, and President Donald Trump. The occasion occurred earlier than Ginsburg was even buried, and Trump went towards her dying, public want of hoping the subsequent president fills her vacant seat

Barrett, a Notre Dame regulation professor who serves as a circuit choose on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, can be nothing in need of a catastrophe for the progress this nation has made, and is a menace to present monumental rulings on equality. 

She has a historical past which reveals she lacks the power to separate church and state, and permits her private non secular beliefs to affect her selections in a secular nation with no official faith. If confirmed, she can be a menace to Muslims and marginalized communities nationwide. 

She has a historical past which reveals she lacks the power to separate church and state, and permits her private non secular beliefs to affect her selections in a secular nation with no official faith.

Conservatives have used a false speaking level about how folks oppose her for being Catholic, however don’t get that propaganda twisted. Nobody critical about what’s at stake right here has a problem together with her Catholicism. 

What now we have a problem with is her beliefs influencing her selections on Roe v. Wade. We have a problem together with her non secular beliefs influencing her selections on circumstances impacting different marginalized minorities and the way it could have an effect on issues just like the Muslim ban, LGBTQ rights, and immigrant rights. The record goes on. 

Imagine if a Muslim choose primarily based their rulings on non secular bias. Let’s say this hypothetical choose received a case the place a Muslim store worker refused to promote somebody pork due to their non secular beliefs, received fired for not doing their job, and took it to courtroom to say their office discriminated towards them religiously. Then, a Muslim choose sided with them regardless of that worker forcing their non secular beliefs on prospects, taking part in sufferer, and getting away with it. 

That all sounds fairly absurd, no? Yet it’s one thing so much with Christians get away with. It’s one thing a conservative Supreme Court permits them to get away with it. More lately, the courtroom sided with a baker who refused to serve and make a marriage cake for a same-sex couple. Because in a rustic with “no official religion,” it’s all the time “religious freedom for me, but not for thee.” 

The precedent tells us that the Supreme Court’s lack of stability will solely end in additional discriminatory rulings. The Supreme Court upheld Trump’s racist and discriminatory Muslim ban. This case was set as much as fail from the get-go as a result of the courtroom was already skewed to the best. If the upper courtroom heard extra circumstances about Muslim discrimination, Barrett would skew the votes even additional to the best.

Muslim Advocates, a civil rights group, additionally identified how her affirmation would damage Muslims civil rights, for the harmless and the responsible:

“In cases involving Muslims swept up in post-9/11 detentions and surveillance programs, the Court has refused to grant any remedy even when it was absolutely clear that the plaintiffs had been innocent of any connection to terrorism. The Court in Ashcroft v. Iqbal and in Ziglar v. Abbasi fashioned procedural barriers to recovery. As a result, Muslims swept up in overbroad counter-terrorism programs are left without any remedy. In 2019, in a reversal of an 11th Circuit decision, the Supreme Court in Dunn v. Ray allowed the state of Alabama to execute a Muslim man without honoring his request to die with an imam by his side, though the same facility regularly allowed its Christian chaplains into the chamber. People of all religions should be able to practice their faith.” 

See Also

Now let’s briefly intersect being Muslim and a lady to see how Barrett would impression us. 

Barrett refused to reveal her beliefs on entry to healthcare reminiscent of contraceptives to the Senate, and has spoken at anti-choice and anti-LGBTQ occasions, and amongst many different issues, she even wrote rules that enable faculties to favor males accused of sexual assault over victims and survivors of assault. 

So Muslim girls will sadly have a fair heavier burden with a 6-3 Supreme Court if Barrett is confirmed, which she possible can be with the shameless Republican-majority Senate. 

Our civil rights, voting rights, bodily autonomy, and entry to our households in varied international locations, is all at stake and on the mercy of the conservative highest courtroom within the land. 

It’s a tragedy that destiny would enable a lady like Barrett, who had the alternatives in regulation that she had due to girls like Ginsburg, to exchange Ginsburg within the courtroom whereas working to undo the monumental equality measures Ginsburg contributed to and constructed her legacy on.

Image courtesy of Getty Images

Source hyperlink

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get New Post's Subscribe Now

You have successfully subscribed to the newsletter

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

Islamic will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.